Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Foreword by Zheng Yongnian -- Foreword by He Xuefeng -- Contents -- About the Author -- List of Main Characters -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- 1 Introduction -- Start from "Justice ( 天)" -- "Justice" and "Injustice" -- Accidental Petition Result -- The Way to Safeguard Rights through Petition Narrows -- Petition Rediscovery -- Petition and Petition Against the Police -- Literature Review and Research Approach -- Data Source -- References -- 2 Overview of the Petition Against the Police: Data Analysis -- Appeals of Petitions Against the Police -- Overview -- Appeals Classified by Object -- Appeals Classified by Process -- Causal Events of Petitions Against the Police -- Repeat Petition and First Petition -- Rural-Urban Differences in the Petition Against the Police -- Conclusion -- Urbanization Promotes the Rise of Petition Trend -- Individual Petition Is a More Serious Problem than Group Petition -- Public Security Case Is Easier to Trigger Petition Against the Police -- The Petition Against the Police Is Easier to Trigger in Rural Areas -- The Petition Against the Police Has Gradually Become a Means for Seeking Private Profits -- Standardization of Law Enforcement is not Bound to Result in the Decrease of Petition Against the Police -- References -- 3 Why the Police Are "Accused"? -- Police and Corruption -- "Five Prohibitions" and Others -- Law Enforcement Flaw -- The First Form of Misconduct -- References -- 4 Policing Supervision and Panopticism -- "Supervision Storm" -- Technology of Power of "Policing Supervision" -- Organizational Network of Policing Supervision -- Policing Supervision Under Panopticism -- Reference -- 5 Zero Tolerance and "Nonfeasance for Fear of Complaint" -- Zero Tolerance Policy -- A System That Allows No Mistakes -- Ungrounded Complaint and No-Fault Punishment -- "Nonfeasance for Fear of Complaint".

This article contextualises China's university think tanks in the history of higher education reforms and proposes that the development of university think tanks is the country's third attempt of institutional reforms in research. One of the goals of the reform is to rebalance the relationship between government power and knowledge producers. In light of the power–knowledge theory, this article utilises university think tanks in Shanghai as a case to assess how well China's new-type university think tanks have achieved the goal of rebalancing power–knowledge relations. Findings have shown that resource allocation and interaction mechanism are the two main factors influencing power–knowledge relations. (CIJ/GIGA)